ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Occupation as an associated risk factor for leptospirosis.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Although several studies have described occupation as an associated risk factor for leptospirosis, most have reported absolute case counts without normalization by the general population, service attendance, or notification capacity. Methods: Accordingly, this study assessed the Brazilian National Surveillance System (SINAN) from 2007 to 2022, examining gathered leptospirosis cases analyzed by occupation as an associated risk factor within the working-age population. To ensure homogeneous attendance and notification capacity, we focused our analysis on the 100 largest Brazilian cities, utilizing censitary working occupation data per region as the denominator for normalization. Non-active populations (students and retirees) were excluded from the denominators to prevent bias dilution. Occupational groups were categorized into low, medium, and high risk for leptospirosis. Results: Overall, the occupations with the highest absolute frequency included farmers (12.0%), construction workers (5.8%), and recycling material collectors (4.6%), with the work environment (75.5%) identified as the most common site of infection. The highest normalized occurrence of leptospirosis was reported in southern Brazil, and high-risk occupational groups showed significantly higher infection rates compared to lower-risk categories (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.