ArticleCureus2026
Comparison of Gaze Behavior During a Visual Search Task in a Virtual Reality Environment Between Individuals With Alzheimer's Disease and Healthy Older Adults.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDecline in spatial attention is a core feature of Alzheimer's disease (AD) that directly impairs everyday visual search behavior, such as locating items during shopping. Japan's rapidly aging population has led to a growing prevalence of dementia, with AD being the most common subtype. The use of virtual reality (VR) enables standardized cognitive assessment in ecologically valid settings.
methodsA total of 25 individuals with AD and 30 healthy controls (HC) aged 65 years or older performed a visual search task presented via a head-mounted display (HMD; VIVE Pro Eye, HTC Corporation, Taoyuan, Taiwan) showing a VR simulation of a supermarket beverage section captured with a 360° camera. Participants were instructed to locate a lemon tea product within 30 seconds. Eye movements were recorded binocularly at 120 Hz. The viewing field was divided into a 48×48 grid; fixation duration and proportion in the central region (columns 20-27, rows 24-33) were extracted and compared between groups using independent samples t-tests. The chi-square test of independence was used to compare the rate of successful target identification.
resultsCompared with HC, the AD group showed significantly longer central fixation duration (11.63 s vs. 6.66 s, p = .009) and a higher central fixation proportion (38.55% vs. 22.06%, p = .009). None of the AD participants identified the target within the time limit, compared with 15 of 30 (50%) HC participants (χ²(1) = 17.19, p < .001, φ = -0.559).
conclusionIndividuals with AD demonstrated a restricted gaze pattern characterized by central fixation bias during VR-based visual search, reflecting impaired exploratory eye movements and narrowed visual search range. These findings suggest that VR-based gaze analysis may serve as a useful tool for evaluating functional visual cognition in AD and that consideration of these gaze characteristics may inform the design of more accessible retail environments and support daily functioning and social participation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.