Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42676918›Full record

ArticleRevista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health2026

Economic impact of standardized hypertension treatment on household income in Argentina: a longitudinal analysis, 2019-2024.

Santiago Torroba, Hilario Bielsa, Nasim Iusef Venturini, Manuel Requejo, Julieta Arilla, Martín Pont Verges

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Santiago TorrobaDepartment of Health and Social Security Poliedro Foundation Buenos Aires Argentina Department of Health and Social Security, Poliedro Foundation, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Hilario BielsaDepartment of Health and Social Security Poliedro Foundation Buenos Aires Argentina Department of Health and Social Security, Poliedro Foundation, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Nasim Iusef VenturiniUniversity Center for Pharmacology School of Medical Sciences National University of La Plata Buenos Aires Argentina University Center for Pharmacology, School of Medical Sciences, National University of La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Manuel RequejoDepartment of Health and Social Security Poliedro Foundation Buenos Aires Argentina Department of Health and Social Security, Poliedro Foundation, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Julieta ArillaDepartment of Health and Social Security Poliedro Foundation Buenos Aires Argentina Department of Health and Social Security, Poliedro Foundation, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Martín Pont VergesDepartment of Health and Social Security Poliedro Foundation Buenos Aires Argentina Department of Health and Social Security, Poliedro Foundation, Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To estimate the economic impact of standard pharmacological treatment for hypertension on a typical household in Argentina using a new indicator relating treatment costs to household income. Methods: A longitudinal study was conducted from December 2019 to December 2024. The standard Argentine antihypertensive treatment (amlodipine 5 mg and losartan 50 mg) was selected. Retail prices of these drugs, both as single-drug combinations and fixed-dose combinations, were obtained from the publicly available Kairos database. The Standard Treatment Economic Impact Index was developed to express monthly out-of-pocket expenditure as a proportion of the total basic basket published by Argentina's National Institute of Statistics and Censuses. Analyses were stratified by household health coverage status - with or without formal coverage. Results: Marked differences were seen in household costs by coverage status. Among households with health coverage, antihypertensive treatment costs represented 2.04%-3.39% of the total basic basket, placing expenditure below catastrophic health expenditure thresholds throughout the study. For households without health coverage, the index ranged from 6.81% to 11.31% of the total basic basket, which was above at least one of the catastrophic health expenditure thresholds used, and sometimes above both. Throughout the study, single-drug combinations were more expensive than fixed-dose combinations. Conclusions: These findings indicate a substantial financial burden for families without formal health coverage when accessing essential antihypertensive therapy. By focusing on treatment affordability rather than total household expenditure, the index may help anticipate and prevent future catastrophic health spending, particularly among uninsured populations.

Indexed as

antihypertensive agentsArgentinahealth expendituresHypertension

Identifiers

PMID42676918
PMCPMC13528677

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.