ArticleClinical pharmacology and therapeutics2026
Model-Informed Approaches for Pediatric Type 2 Diabetes Evidence Generation: Insights from a Model-Based Longitudinal HbA1c Meta-Analysis from EMA Marketing Authorization Applications.
Article in Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Evidence generation for antihyperglycemic therapies in pediatric type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) remains challenging, with most randomized trials failing to demonstrate statistically significant reductions in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), partly due to substantial between-subject variability. To better understand the sources and implications of this variability, we conducted a model-based longitudinal meta-analysis of individual participant data from seven pediatric T2DM clinical trials submitted to the European Medicines Agency in support of marketing authorization applications. The analysis incorporated 3295 HbA1c observations from 809 participants and quantified the contributions of baseline disease severity, disease progression, placebo response, and treatment effects to longitudinal HbA1c dynamics. Insulin use and longer duration of diabetes were associated with higher baseline HbA1c and/or faster disease progression, while the placebo effect was substantial and highly variable across participants. Clinical trial simulations using the final model demonstrated that trials with fewer than 200 participants are unlikely to achieve 80% power to detect placebo-corrected treatment effects smaller than -0.70%-points over 26 weeks. Enrichment strategies targeting patients with lower variability, as well as model-based estimators-including Bayesian approaches leveraging historical information-substantially reduced the required sample size. These findings indicate that current pediatric T2DM trials are typically underpowered due to underestimation of HbA1c variability and highlight opportunities for more efficient trial designs. By quantifying disease- and treatment-related drivers of HbA1c trajectories and demonstrating the potential of model-informed strategies to improve power, this work provides a framework to enhance pediatric T2DM drug development and support regulatory decision-making.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.