ArticleDermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026
[Wound care following dermatologic surgical procedures].
Article in Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPostoperative wound care is an essential component of dermatologic surgical procedures and has a significant impact on wound healing as well as esthetic and functional outcomes. In clinical practice, considerable differences exist with regard to the antiseptics used, dressing materials, and follow-up care concepts. Robust data on current postoperative wound care practices in dermatologic surgery in Germany are limited.
objectivesThe aim of this study was to assess current postoperative wound care practices among skin surgeons in Germany and to compare them with evidence-based recommendations. MATERIALS AND
methodsAn anonymous, internet-based survey comprising 26 questions on postoperative wound care was conducted. The questionnaire was distributed to all members of the German Society for Dermatologic Surgery and was additionally offered during the 2025 annual meeting. Data were analyzed descriptively.
resultsA total of 62 fully completed questionnaires were analyzed. Octenidine-containing or alcohol-based antiseptics were predominantly used both preoperatively and during dressing changes. Postoperative wound care following primary wound closure was largely homogeneous, whereas a high variability in dressing materials was observed for wounds healing by secondary intention. Topical antibiotics continued to be used to a significant extent despite the risk of developing resistance.
conclusionThe results demonstrate substantial heterogeneity in postoperative wound care and only partial implementation of evidence-based recommendations. In particular, the routine use of topical antibiotics and antiseptics in noninfected wounds appears questionable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42678526What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.