Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42678627›Full record

ReviewHeart failure reviews2026

Cardiac implantable electronic devices in heart failure: needs, challenges, and real-world implementation.

David Žižek, Miha Mrak, Anja Zupan Mežnar, Maja Ivanovski, Tadej Žlahtič, Christopher F Barrientos, Andrew P Ambrosy, Zlatko Fras, Mauro Biffi, Mitja Lainscak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heart failure reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

David ŽižekDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia. david.zizek@kclj.si.
Miha MrakDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Anja Zupan MežnarDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Maja IvanovskiDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Tadej ŽlahtičDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Christopher F BarrientosKaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Andrew P AmbrosyKaiser Permanente San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Zlatko FrasFaculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Mauro Biffi *Institute of Cardiology, Cardiology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Mitja Lainscak *Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Funding

Slovenian Research and Innovation Agency P03-456
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are integral to heart failure (HF) management, providing therapies for bradyarrhythmias, cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), sudden cardiac death (SCD) prevention, and remote monitoring. This review summarizes current and potential future indications, emerging technologies, and challenges in the implementation of CIEDs in HF. Conventional right ventricular pacing in HF patients is increasingly being replaced by biventricular pacing (BVP) and left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP), while leadless pacing pacemakers have emerged as an alternative to conventional transvenous systems, offering the potential to reduce lead- and device-related complications. As BVP remains the standard approach for CRT, recent data bestow LBBAP as a promising alternative and integration platform. Newer implantable cardioverter-defibrillator technologies, including subcutaneous and extravascular systems, may reduce lead-related complications while maintaining effective arrhythmia termination and recognition. Advances in atrial fibrillation management, implantable hemodynamic monitoring, and novel pacing indications such as atrioventricular recoupling and personalized pacing in HF with preserved ejection fraction are expanding the therapeutic potential of CIEDs. However, the adoption of these innovations is challenged by limited randomized evidence, procedural complexity, and substantial disparities in access and implementation across healthcare systems. Ongoing clinical trials will help define the role of emerging device technologies and monitoring strategies, while efforts to improve guideline adherence, value-based procurement, and equitable access remain essential to maximize the benefits of CIED therapy in patients with HF.

Indexed as

Cardiac Resynchronization TherapyCardiac Resynchronization Therapy DevicesDeath, Sudden, CardiacDefibrillators, ImplantableHeart FailureHumansBiventricular pacingCardiac implantable electronic devicesConduction system pacingHeart failureImplantable cardioverter-defibrillatorLeadless pacing

Identifiers

PMID42678627
PMCPMC13534176

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.