Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42679375›Full record

ReviewThe journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences2026

How human and animal frailty index studies can inform each other: a brief narrative review.

Andrew Rutenberg, Kenneth Rockwood

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Andrew RutenbergDepartment of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.
Kenneth RockwoodDepartment of Medicine (Geriatric Medicine), Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6674-995X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Frailty is common in older people, who are much more often studied than older animals. This makes it less surprising that research in frailty largely began with insights from humans before being translated into frailty in animals. Back translation from animal models to humans followed. Here, we review this interplay. We highlight how properties of the deficit accumulation approach to frailty (our focus) have been reproduced in animals. These include the distribution of frailty scores, the regularity of their change, and the presence of a submaximal limit that appears to reflect the mortality risk associated with significant health deficit accumulation. We offer examples of how animal models have helped us to understand age-related health changes. These changes reflect an increase in health deficits but also a reduction in the ability to withstand lesser potentially damaging stress (robustness) or to repair such damage when it occurs (resilience). Investigations into how age and sex affect the dynamics of deficit accumulation, in both human and animal models, are underway. Studying frailty in preclinical models will benefit our understanding of health dynamics and health, both for preclinical models and for us.

Indexed as

AgingFrailtyAgedAnimalsDisease Models, AnimalFrail ElderlyHumansModels, AnimalAnimal modelsBiology of agingFrailtyHuman agingSex

Identifiers

PMID42679375
PMCPMC13614716

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.