ReviewBMJ health & care informatics2026
How to develop care pathways: a practical overview of methodological approaches.
Review in BMJ health & care informatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Care pathways are essential to enhance the organisation of care, optimise resource use and improve patient outcomes, thereby supporting value-based healthcare. As care pathways are increasingly required, there is a need for clear methodological guidance on the identification and visualisation of care pathways. This perspective article provides an overview of methodological approaches to support the identification and visualisation of these care pathways. Two possible methods are described, including co-creation and process mining as well as different visualisation techniques that can be applied for care pathway presentation. Moreover, practical guidance as well as advantages and limitations of each identification method are discussed to further support decision-making.Whether to implement co-creation or process mining, or use a combined approach, depends on several factors, such as the intended purpose and end users of the care pathway, time availability, level of expertise at hand, the structure and quality of the data, as well as stakeholder needs and availability. These considerations will vary for different clinical conditions and care processes involved. With anticipated workforce shortages, rising healthcare costs and increasing prevalence of hybrid and virtual care, delivering efficient, patient-centred and personalised care has become imperative. Consequently, the development of care pathways is essential to eliminate unnecessary interventions or those that do not meaningfully contribute to patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.