ArticleNature communications2026
Promoter identity shapes splicing outcomes and fidelity.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gene expression is a complex process subject to regulation at multiple functionally interconnected levels. One prominent example is the crosstalk between transcription and splicing regulation. Past work has shown that transcription can influence splicing in multiple ways, but a systematic investigation of this complex interplay is lacking. Here we employ massively parallel reporter assays of large combinatorial promoter-splice site libraries to dissect how promoter identity and transcription dynamics affect alternative splicing in human cells. We find that promoter identity, rather than expression level, exerts strong and highly context-specific effects on cassette exon inclusion, exceeding the effect of pharmacological inhibitors of transcription initiation or elongation. Groups of exons display coordinated promoter-dependent splicing behavior, and we identified predictive sequence and structural features underlying this sensitivity. Promoter and gene architecture also shape isoform diversity by modulating cryptic splice site usage. These findings present promoters as central regulators of splicing outcomes and fidelity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.