ArticleScientific reports2026
Development and pilot evaluation of an electronic trigger-based surveillance model for sedative-hypnotic drug misuse in a tertiary hospital.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Sedative-hypnotic drugs (SHDs) carry significant risks of misuse and dependence. However, current institutional pharmacovigilance relies heavily on passive reporting, leading to substantial underreporting and data gaps. This study aimed to develop and conduct a pilot evaluation of an electronic trigger-based active surveillance model integrated into a Hospital Information System (HIS) to proactively identify high-risk prescription patterns and suspected SHD dependence. This two-phase study was conducted at a tertiary hospital. First, a retrospective analysis of 16,609 outpatient prescriptions was performed to characterize anomalous utilization. Second, a "Trigger Dictionary" based on the Global Trigger Tool (GTT) was developed to flag suspicious cases for a 10-day prospective pilot evaluation. Patients with suspected dependence were screened through structured telephone interviews using ICD-10 diagnostic criteria among flagged patients with ≥ 1-year SHD use. Retrospective analysis revealed that 30.03% of patients (2,616/8,710) received at least one off-label prescription. It also identified 1,567 clusters in which multiple patient IDs shared identical residential addresses, serving as a potential, hypothesis-generating signal for drug diversion. During the prospective pilot, the system generated 200 automated alerts. Among the 63 high-risk patients interviewed, 17 were identified as meeting the screening criteria for suspected SHD dependence, yielding a Positive Predictive Value (PPV) of 26.98% within this selected high-risk interviewed cohort. In contrast, zero cases were reported via the passive system during the same period. Univariate analysis identified benzodiazepine use (OR 33.07, 95% CI: 3.95-276.81, P < 0.001), advanced age, and prolonged therapy duration as exploratory factors associated with suspected misuse. This 10-day prospective pilot evaluation suggests that the electronic trigger model can identify cases of suspected drug dependence that were not captured by traditional passive reporting during the same period. This automated framework offers a scalable approach for clinical pharmacists to triage high-risk patients and mitigate potential drug diversion risks, potentially enhancing medication safety in high-volume outpatient settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.