ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026
Go with the Phloem: A Review of the Methods to Collect Plant Phloem Tissue.
Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The study of plant phloem tissue is important for understanding plant physiology, yet the anatomy and small size of the phloem tissue make direct sampling challenging. Due to the absence of a single method that allows for phloem extraction in every species, researchers have developed several strategies to address this drawback. These strategies can be categorized into three groups: classical, advanced, and mechanical extraction methods. Classical methods, including cucurbit drip, EDTA-facilitated exudation, stylectomy, and heterografting, have a long history in phloem research but are generally less precise. Advanced methods, such as TRAP-seq, FACS, scRNA-seq, and LCM, leverage recent technological advancements to provide precise measurements, with the drawback of requiring specialized expertise and costly reagents. Mechanical methods focus on species from which phloem can be directly sampled, Plantago and celery. This review discusses these methods, detailing their advantages and disadvantages, and how they can be applied to current phloem studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42681124What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.