Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42681124›Full record

ReviewMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2026

Go with the Phloem: A Review of the Methods to Collect Plant Phloem Tissue.

Hannah Levengood, Juliana Miranda, Samantha Barker, Maria Fernanda Ovalle, Cankui Zhang

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Hannah LevengoodDepartment of Agronomy, Center for Plant Biology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA. hlevengo@purdue.edu.
Juliana MirandaDepartment of Agronomy, Center for Plant Biology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5574-0204
Samantha BarkerDepartment of Agronomy, Center for Plant Biology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-9763-5157
Maria Fernanda OvalleDepartment of Agronomy, Center for Plant Biology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA.
Cankui ZhangDepartment of Agronomy, Center for Plant Biology, Purdue University, West Lafayette, USA. ckzhang@purdue.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The study of plant phloem tissue is important for understanding plant physiology, yet the anatomy and small size of the phloem tissue make direct sampling challenging. Due to the absence of a single method that allows for phloem extraction in every species, researchers have developed several strategies to address this drawback. These strategies can be categorized into three groups: classical, advanced, and mechanical extraction methods. Classical methods, including cucurbit drip, EDTA-facilitated exudation, stylectomy, and heterografting, have a long history in phloem research but are generally less precise. Advanced methods, such as TRAP-seq, FACS, scRNA-seq, and LCM, leverage recent technological advancements to provide precise measurements, with the drawback of requiring specialized expertise and costly reagents. Mechanical methods focus on species from which phloem can be directly sampled, Plantago and celery. This review discusses these methods, detailing their advantages and disadvantages, and how they can be applied to current phloem studies.

Indexed as

PhloemPlantsCarbon allocationGraftingPhloem exudatePlantagoSugar transportTRAP-seq

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.