ReviewBiomarker research2026
Mechanisms, optimization strategies, and salvage options for CAR-T cell therapy.
Review in Biomarker research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy has transformed the treatment landscape for relapsed or refractory hematologic malignancies, producing high remission rates in otherwise treatment-resistant patients. However, primary resistance and disease relapse remain common, particularly in solid tumors, limiting long-term benefit and broader clinical applicability. As the population of patients failing therapy grows, there is an urgent need for an integrated understanding of resistance mechanisms and a structured approach to salvage therapy. This review proposes a conceptual "Why-How-What if" framework to navigate the complexities of treatment failure. We first address "Why" therapy fails, identifying multifactorial drivers including tumor-intrinsic factors like antigen loss and immune evasion, T cell-intrinsic dysfunction such as exhaustion and limited persistence, and extrinsic constraints imposed by an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment. We then explore "How" to enhance efficacy through mechanism-based strategies. These include rational combination approaches with immune checkpoint inhibitors or small molecule inhibitors, and next-generation engineering such as dual-target, armored, and in vivo generated CAR-T cells aimed at overcoming metabolic and physical barriers. Finally, we address the "What if" of treatment failure by summarizing individualized salvage options, for which current clinical evidence is derived predominantly from hematologic malignancies. These strategies range from target-switching and bispecific antibodies to emerging cellular platforms like CAR-natural killer cells and consolidation via allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. By integrating mechanisms of failure with evolving optimization and salvage strategies, this framework provides a practical roadmap for clinical and translational progress. Future success will depend on biomarker-guided combinations and the continued diversification of adoptive cell therapy platforms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.