ReviewCardiovascular diabetology. Endocrinology reports2026
Cardiometabolic outcomes of once-weekly IcoSema in adults with type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis of the COMBINE trials.
Review in Cardiovascular diabetology. Endocrinology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with type 2 diabetes face a high residual risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) despite advances in therapy. Once-weekly IcoSema, a fixed-ratio combination of basal insulin icodec and semaglutide, offers the potential to simultaneously address glycemic control, weight, and multiple cardiometabolic risk factors with a single weekly injection.
methodsWe conducted a PRISMA-compliant systematic review and random-effects meta-analysis of randomized trials from the COMBINE program. Data from COMBINE 1 (active comparator: once-weekly insulin icodec) and COMBINE 3 (active comparator: basal-bolus insulin therapy) (N = 1,970) were pooled comparing IcoSema with insulin-based intensification strategies in patients inadequately controlled on basal insulin. COMBINE 2 was excluded because its semaglutide monotherapy comparator addresses a fundamentally different clinical question (escalation from GLP-1 RA monotherapy). The primary focus was on changes in body weight, Systolic blood pressure and HbA1c; key secondary outcomes included changes in lipid profile relevant to ASCVD risk. Certainty of evidence was assessed using GRADE.
resultsIcoSema showed no statistically significant difference in HbA1c reduction compared with control (pooled MD -0.37%, 95% CI -0.95 to 0.21; P = 0.21; I²=98%) but shows highly significant body weight reduction (pooled MD -6.10 kg, 95% CI -7.21 to -5.00; P < 0.00001). It significantly lowered systolic blood pressure (MD -2.45 mmHg, 95% CI -3.52 to -1.38; P < 0.00001), total cholesterol (ETR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-0.98; P = 0.0001), LDL-C (ETR 0.94, 95% CI 0.90-0.98; P = 0.005), triglycerides (ETR 0.94, 95% CI 0.91-0.97; P = 0.0006), and VLDL-C (ETR 0.94). An exploratory, hypothetical ASCVD risk modeling analysis based on these surrogate-marker changes is presented in the Supplementary Appendix and is intended as an illustration only.
conclusionsOnce-weekly IcoSema delivers meaningful improvements in weight, blood pressure, and atherogenic lipids, all key modifiable drivers of ASCVD in adults with type 2 diabetes. These surrogate benefits, combined with reduced injection burden and low risk of hypoglycemia, suggest potential for enhanced ASCVD prevention and improved long-term adherence. Results should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating only because only two trials met the inclusion criteria. Dedicated cardiovascular outcome trials are essential to validate these surrogate-marker benefits and to confirm whether they translate into a reduction in cardiovascular events.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.