ArticleInternational journal of retina and vitreous2026
Two-year real-world effectiveness of faricimab after treatment switch in neovascular age-related macular degeneration.
Article in International journal of retina and vitreous, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- From Trials to Treatment: Current Evidence Supporting Faricimab Use in nAMD and DME.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate the 2-year real-world outcomes of switching to intravitreal faricimab in patients with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) previously treated with anti-VEGF agents and unable to extend treatment intervals (TI) beyond 12 weeks.
methodsProspective cohort study including patients with nAMD managed under a treat-and-extend regimen who required frequent anti-VEGF injections (< 12-week intervals) to maintain retinal dryness. Patients were switched to faricimab without a loading phase and followed for a minimum of 2 years. TI were extended in 4-week increments based on anatomical response. The primary outcome was change in TIl; secondary outcomes included change in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and identification of predictors of response. "Optimal responders" were defined as eyes achieving ≥ 8-week interval extension.
resultsA total of 110 eyes from 97 patients were included (mean age 78.7 ± 9.8 years). Prior to switching, the mean TI was 6.18 ± 2.05 weeks, which increased significantly to 13.61 ± 5.62 weeks at the last follow-up visit (p < 0.001). BCVA remained stable over 2 years (0.42 ± 0.24 vs. 0.43 ± 0.25; p = 0.0117). At final follow-up, 68.2% of eyes achieved intervals ≥ 12 weeks, 20.0% ≥16 weeks, and 24.6% reached ≥ 20-week intervals. Overall, 89.1% of eyes experienced interval extension. Optimal responders accounted for 47.3% of eyes and were significantly younger and had received fewer prior injections (p < 0.05).
conclusionsSwitching to faricimab in previous treated nAMD patients enabled meaningful extension of TI over 2 years while maintaining stable visual acuity. These findings support faricimab as an effective strategy to reduce treatment burden in patients who are difficult to extend with prior anti-VEGF therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.