ReviewExperimental physiology2026
Cerebral blood flow in conscious rats and implications for therapeutic interventions.
Review in Experimental physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cerebral blood flow in conscious rats and implications for therapeutic interventions.Experimental physiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cerebral blood flow (CBF) often becomes compromised in patients suffering from cardiovascular diseases, increasing the risk of neurodegenerative disease and vascular dementia. There is an urgent need for treatments to address cardiovascular risk without compromising brain perfusion, yet the impact of many existing treatments on CBF are not well understood. An exclusive focus on arterial blood pressure (BP) control against a background of cerebral vascular damage may miss an opportunity to restore cerebral haemodynamic regulation and mitigate risk to cognitive function. This Symposium Review focuses on the possibility and promise of assessing and optimising CBF during treatment for cardiovascular diseases. This is especially relevant given the new interest in pathways that protect brain health via cerebrospinal fluid exchange, such as the glymphatic system. Insights into the fundamental mechanisms connecting vascular motility and brain health can be gleaned from conscious, high-fidelity measurements of CBF. We believe that CBF monitoring is crucial in the development of novel compounds, or re-evaluation of current drugs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.