ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2026
An interpretable whole-stream video based deep learning framework for surgical skill assessment of basic procedural elements.
Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Conventional surgical skill assessment, conducted by expert surgeons in operating rooms, is often time-consuming and subjective. An automated and objective system capable of differentiating surgeon expertise levels (novice, intermediate, and expert) and providing feedback would significantly enhance surgical training. However, most existing automated frameworks prioritize deep learning performance over interpretability. Materials and methods: We propose I3D-SAP, an interpretable video-based surgical skill assessment framework of basic procedural elements using a 3D convolutional neural network. The model processes surgical videos and classifies surgeons into three expertise levels. Experiments are conducted on the public JIGSAWS dataset, evaluating performance across suturing, needle passing, and knot tying tasks. Results: Our method has achieved high accuracy: 100% (suturing), 96.3% (needle passing), and 97.2% (knot tying), comparable to the state-of-the-art models. Our framework's interpretability is demonstrated through Class Activation Map (CAM) visualization and snippet-wise analysis, offering dual perspectives to explain classification decisions. However, evaluation under a more rigorous Leave-One-User-Out (LOUO) protocol revealed a significant performance drop, and testing on an external dataset (ROSMA) resulted in near-chance-level accuracy, indicating that the current model's ability to generalize to entirely unseen surgeons is limited. Conclusion: I3D-SAP provides both high accuracy and interpretability, addressing a critical gap in automated surgical assessment of basic procedural elements. By visualizing the model decisions, it enhances transparency and trust, paving the way for practical adoption in surgical training. Moreover, the model's current generalizability challenges should be addressed through future work involving larger, more diverse datasets and techniques for surgeon-invariant feature learning before practical clinical deployment can be considered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.