ReviewFrontiers in public health2026
Access to cervical cancer care in sub-Saharan Africa: a narrative review of barriers and opportunities.
Review in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This narrative review examines the barriers and opportunities that shape access and delivery of cervical cancer care services in sub-Saharan Africa. Unlike prior studies that only focused on single phases of care, this review adopts a comprehensive perspective by assessing access across the full cervical cancer care continuum. Methods: A narrative review was conducted using six databases (Embase, Medline, Web of Science, Scopus, African Index Medicus, and CINAHL Plus). The included studies were thematically analyzed, and emerging themes were interpreted through the lens of the five dimensions of healthcare access: accessibility, availability, affordability, acceptability, and accommodation. Results: Across 38 included studies, findings identified three overarching categories of barriers. (1) Individual-level barriers, including knowledge and awareness, socio-demographic and economic factors, and attitudes and beliefs; (2) Community-level barriers, including cultural acceptance and social norms, and community and social support networks, which further constrained engagement with services; and (3) Health-system-level barriers, including resource limitations, service delivery and quality, and weak policy implementation, which compounded delays and limited care effectiveness. Moreover, opportunities, such as methodological opportunities (community-driven health education, culturally informed healthcare interventions, and multi-stakeholder engagement) and technological opportunities (technology-enhanced health education, digital systems for patient navigation, and task decentralization using mobile health platforms, telehealth, electronic health records, and digital reminder systems), could be effectively integrated into the healthcare system to improve access and service delivery. Conclusion: Access to cervical cancer care in sub-Saharan Africa is shaped by interconnected structural, sociocultural, and individual barriers that extend beyond supply and service availability alone. Literature often focuses on screening, diagnosis, and treatment of cervical cancer, while research gaps identified in this review persist in primary prevention, follow-up, and palliative care services. Findings from the review suggest that integrated, context-specific, and human-centered healthcare interventions are needed to strengthen care coordination, improve access, and enhance care outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.