ArticleInternational journal of surgery (London, England)2026
Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty video annotation: analysis of the learning curve of three annotators to achieve procedure proficiency.
Article in International journal of surgery (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Endoscopic interventional skills acquisition generally relies on apprenticeship-based training. Limitations of this learning model include the availability of trainers and human-factor biases. Increased routine surgical and endoscopic video recording and storage promote video-based learning (VBL) methods. VBL could shorten the learning curve by increasing trainer availability and democratizing training access for procedures such as endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG), which is carried out by a few expert operators. The aim of this work was to evaluate video annotation as a learning tool for ESG. Methods: Videos of ESG performed at a single center were collected and annotated. An annotation manual developed by an ESG expert was used by three annotators with different levels of endoscopic and ESG expertise. Pairwise Cohen's kappa was used to assess inter-rater reliability (IRR). Completion of the learning curve for each phase and feature of ESG was calculated as the probability of accordance among annotators and estimated by a moving average optimization model with an expectation-maximization algorithm. Results: In total, 40 ESG videos were annotated. IRR pairwise kappa scores ranged between 0.44 (Annotator 1 and 3) and 0.58 (Annotator 2 and 3). Learning curve analysis showed that a different number of procedures need to be annotated to master the various phases of ESG, with the "other suture phase" needing the highest number of procedures ( Conclusions: The learning process differs among trainees, as mirrored in the variable number of procedures needed to master ESG. Tailoring training for different trainees could lead to the shortening of learning curves. Some features of ESG are mastered more quickly; however, careful and repeated practice is essential for minimizing errors in more complex features. VBL could play a role in the democratization of high-level learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.