ArticleFrontiers in pediatrics2026
Development and internal validation of a monocyte-to-albumin ratio-based risk assessment model for coronary artery lesions in Kawasaki disease.
Article in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Coronary artery lesions (CAL) are the most severe complication of Kawasaki disease (KD), yet accurate and practical risk assessment tools remain limited. This study aimed to develop and validate a parsimonious logistic regression model for CAL risk assessment using routine clinical and laboratory parameters. Methods: A total of 324 consecutive KD patients were retrospectively enrolled. Candidate predictors were screened by univariate analysis and a strict consensus-based strategy integrating five feature-selection methods (LASSO, random forest, Boruta, recursive feature elimination, and univariate threshold). Ten machine learning algorithms were compared, and the final model was selected based on performance and interpretability. A nomogram, calibration curve, and an online calculator were developed. Results: Among 324 patients, 64 (19.8%) had baseline CAL. Four variables [fever duration, GGT, monocyte-to-albumin ratio (MAR), and ESR] were consistently selected by all five methods. Logistic regression yielded a Brier score of 0.142, with high specificity (0.846), but limited sensitivity (0.421) on the hold-out test set. No significant effect modification was observed in exploratory interaction analyses assessing the association of MAR on CAL across the evaluated covariates (all adjusted Conclusions: A simple four-variable logistic model incorporating fever duration, GGT, ESR, and MAR provides preliminary CAL risk assessment. However, the modest event count and single-center nature mandate multi-center external validation before any clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.