Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42682914›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2026

Toward a transdiagnostic modifier for clinically significant loneliness in psychiatry: a conceptual mini review.

Alison Warren

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Alison WarrenDepartment of Clinical Research and Leadership, George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Loneliness, the feeling that arises from the subjective perception of inadequate social connection, is increasingly recognized as a significant and modifiable determinant of health with effects spanning mental, cognitive, and physical domains. Despite a robust evidence base linking loneliness to adverse mental and physical health outcomes, it remains insufficiently integrated into psychiatric assessment and diagnostic frameworks, limiting its visibility in a patient's clinical picture and treatment planning. This paper proposes reconceptualizing clinically significant loneliness as a transdiagnostic diagnostic modifier within psychiatric practice. Loneliness is positioned as a multisystem exposure operating across diagnostic categories through shared neurobiological and psychosocial pathways. From a translational science perspective, this reconceptualization offers a pragmatic strategy to bridge the gap between evidence and practice by embedding a clinically actionable construct into routine care. Importantly, assessing loneliness alongside psychiatric diagnoses enhances understanding of patients' lived experiences, providing critical contextual insight into how symptoms are experienced, maintained, and treated. Incorporating loneliness as a modifier supports improved risk stratification, treatment planning, and care coordination while preserving the contextual nature of the experience. Integrating loneliness into psychiatric assessment represents a feasible and scalable step toward more comprehensive, person-centered care.

Indexed as

implementation scienceknowledge translationlonelinesspsychiatrysocial determinants of healthsocial isolationtransdiagnostic

Identifiers

PMID42682914
PMCPMC13531342

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.