ArticlePsychology research and behavior management2026
Psychological Resource Profiles and Learning Engagement Among Rural Left-Behind Adolescents in China: A Latent Profile Analysis.
Article in Psychology research and behavior management, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: With increasing labor mobility between urban and rural regions, rural left-behind adolescents in China have become a group requiring attention in both educational and psychological domains. This study aimed to identify distinct psychological resource profiles among rural left-behind adolescents and examine their differences in learning engagement. Patients and Methods: This study employed latent profile analysis (LPA) to identify distinct psychological resource profiles based on four key dimensions: mindfulness, grit, growth mindset, and perceived social support. Results: Four latent profiles were identified among the participants: "High Mindfulness-High Support", "Isolated High Mindfulness", "Moderate Resource Integration", and "Low Mindfulness-High Motivation". Significant differences in learning engagement were observed across these profiles. Specifically, adolescents in the "High Mindfulness-High Support" and "Low Mindfulness-High Motivation" groups showed higher levels of learning engagement, whereas those in the "Isolated High Mindfulness" group showed the lowest level of engagement. Age was significantly associated with profile membership, whereas gender showed no significant association. Conclusion: These findings highlight the heterogeneity of psychological resource configurations among rural left-behind adolescents and suggest that different profiles are associated with distinct levels of learning engagement. The results may provide a descriptive basis for future longitudinal and intervention studies on learning engagement in this population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.