ReviewSleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society2026
A systematic review of obstructive sleep apnea in Indigenous peoples worldwide.
Review in Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Study Objectives: Emerging evidence indicates that Indigenous peoples experience disproportionately high rates of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). This systematic review aimed to examine OSA prevalence, contributing factors, and intervention or treatment outcomes among Indigenous peoples worldwide. Materials and Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, ATSI Health, Web of Science and PsycINFO (last searched June 30, 2025), and grey literature for original research involving Indigenous peoples (≥18 years) diagnosed with OSA via self-report or laboratory-based measures (e.g. polysomnography). Data extraction focused on study characteristics and key findings. Methodological quality was assessed using NIH tools, and cultural appropriateness was evaluated using the CREATE Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Quality Appraisal Tool. A narrative synthesis was conducted. Results: From 599 records, 41 studies from six countries were included. OSA prevalence among Indigenous populations varied widely (community-based samples, 6.5%-69%; referred samples, 85%-95%; self-reported diagnosis, 1.2%-8.4%; hospital audit diagnoses, 0.8%-11.4%), with only one study reporting a robust population-based estimate (~6.5% among Māori). Severe cases predominated in referred samples. Factors associated with OSA included male sex, age, BMI, neck circumference, craniofacial and geographic factors, and symptoms such as snoring. Treatment evidence was limited to CPAP, with low adherence. Conclusions: Findings suggests that OSA is common among Indigenous peoples across diverse settings. However, prevalence estimates are heterogeneous and limited by differences in study design, sampling frame, and diagnostic approaches, with most evidence based on referred clinical samples. Improving awareness and culturally responsive screening and management may improve outcomes. Sleep health among Indigenous peoples warrants a higher priority in research, policy and practice. Registration: The protocol for this systematic review was registered with Prospero (CRD42024466932).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.