ArticleERJ open research2026
Elevated risk of first-time pulmonary hypertension among COVID-19 survivors: a 4.5-year longitudinal study.
Article in ERJ open research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection could result in pulmonary vascular injury, systemic inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction, which could increase future risk of pulmonary hypertension (PH) and related complications. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study from the Montefiore Medical Center (Bronx, NY, USA) (1 March 2020 to 17 August 2024). Patients who had a COVID-19 PCR test were compared to those who did not have a positive COVID-19 PCR test on record. There were 15 721 hospitalised COVID-19 patients, 43 740 non-hospitalised COVID-19 patients, and 870 458 contemporary COVID-negative controls, and 634 892 historical (1 May 2016 to 31 December 2019) controls. The main analysis used propensity score matching for demographics, tobacco, substance use disorder, vaccination for SARS-CoV-2, and pre-existing comorbidities. New-onset PH and PH-related complications were assessed using Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard ratios (sHR). Sensitivity analyses included multivariable cause-specific Cox proportional hazard model, inverse probability weighting, and using matched historical cohort as controls. Long-term PH-related complications included heart failure, chronic kidney disease, and all-cause mortality compared to matched controls. Blood biomarkers during acute COVID-19 were analysed with respect to new-onset PH. Results: Compared to propensity-matched COVID-negative controls, COVID-19 hospitalised patients were (sHR) 1.41 (95% CI 1.27-1.57) times more likely to experience new-onset PH, and COVID-19 non-hospitalised patients were 1.42 (95% CI 1.25-1.61) times more likely to do so. Sensitivity analyses corroborated our main findings. Among those with new-onset PH, only hospitalised COVID-19 survivors had higher risks of subsequent heart failure (sHR 1.61, 95% CI 1.11-2.35), chronic kidney disease (2.18, 1.50-3.16), and all-cause mortality (1.81, 1.47-2.24) compared to matched controls. Abnormal troponin (sHR 1.61, 95% CI 1.05-2.48), brain natriuretic peptide (1.59, 1.20-2.11) and creatinine (1.24, 1.01-1.51) during acute COVID-19 were associated with outcomes, but not D-dimer, ferritin and haematological markers. Conclusions: SARS-CoV-2 infection is independently associated with elevated long-term risk of new-onset PH, whereas only hospitalised COVID-19 status is associated with higher risk of downstream PH-related complications. These findings underscore the importance of ongoing PH surveillance in COVID-19 survivors.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.