Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42685022›Full record

ArticlePLOS digital health2026

Data distribution impacts the performance and generalisability of contrastive learning-based foundation models of electrocardiograms.

Gul Rukh Khattak, Konstantinos Patlatzoglou, Joseph Barker, Libor Pastika, Boroumand Zeidaabadi, Aidan R Birdi, Jiayu Huo, Ahmed El-Medany, Hesham Aggour, Yixiu Liang and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Gul Rukh KhattakNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0674-2833
Konstantinos PatlatzoglouNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Joseph BarkerNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Libor PastikaNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Boroumand ZeidaabadiNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Aidan R BirdiNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jiayu HuoNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ahmed El-MedanyNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4419-6693
Hesham AggourNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4825-4002
Yixiu LiangNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Antonio H RibeiroDepartment of Information Technology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden.
Jeffrey AnnisVanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Antonio Luiz Pinho RibeiroDepartment of Internal Medicine, Faculdade de Medicina, and Telehealth Center and Cardiology Service, Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil.
Junbo GeDepartment of Cardiology, Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases, National Clinical Research Centre for Interventional Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Daniel B KramerRichard A. and Susan F. Smith Center for Outcomes Research in Cardiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Jonathan W WaksHarvard-Thorndike Electrophysiology Institute, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Evan BrittainVanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, United States of America.
Nicholas PetersNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Fu Siong NgNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8681-4368
Arunashis SauNational Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contrastive learning is a widely adopted self-supervised pretraining strategy, yet its dependence on cohort composition remains underexplored. We present Contrasting by Augmented Patient Electrocardiograms (CAPE) foundation model and pretrain on four cohorts (n = 5,203,269), from diverse populations across three continents (North America, South America, Asia). We systematically assess how cohort demographics, health status, and population diversity influence the downstream performance for prediction tasks also including two additional cohorts from another continent (Europe). We find that downstream performance depends on the distributional properties of the pretraining cohort, including demographics and health status. Moreover, while pretraining with a multi-centre, demographically diverse cohort improves in-distribution accuracy, it reduces out-of-distribution (OOD) generalisation of our contrastive approach by encoding cohort-specific artifacts. To address this, we propose the In-Distribution Batch (IDB) strategy, which preserves intra-cohort consistency during pretraining, discourages learning of spurious cohort-specific features, and instead promotes clinically meaningful variability within cohorts. This leads to improved out-of-distribution robustness, with gains of 9-40% in downstream label prediction performance. This work provides insights into pretraining strategies for more clinically deployable and generalisable foundation models.

Identifiers

PMID42685022
PMCPMC13537565

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.