ArticlePloS one2026
Impact of the Food4Moms produce prescription program on readiness for healthy eating, fruit and vegetable intake, and food security.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05907616 (Feasibility and Impact of the FOOD4MOMS Produce Prescription Program Among Pregnant Latina Women), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Feasibility and Impact of the FOOD4MOMS Produce Prescription Program Among Pregnant Latina Women
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Produce prescription (PRx) programs targeting different populations and conditions have been found to be effective. However, few have focused on pregnant women. The objectives of this study were to assess the impact of the Food4Moms (F4M) PRx program on 1) healthy eating stages of change 2) intake of fruits and vegetables (i.e., produce), and 3) household food security among pregnant Latina women. F4M recruited low-income Latinas living in Greater Hartford, Connecticut that received a "produce prescription" from a Registered Dietitian based at the community-based organization (CBO) where the program was implemented. Participants were offered $100 per month for 10 months through Fresh Connect debit cards that only worked to purchase fresh produce from two food retailers or the equivalent value in fresh produce delivered at home. To be fully enrolled in F4M, participants had to complete a baseline survey and the first nutrition education interactive session. Enrolled participants were offered additional nutrition education sessions at the CBO and received text messages with nutrition tips as well as reminders to spend their remaining benefit balances towards the end of each month. A single-group pre-post study design was used to assess the impact of F4M 10 months after the card activation. No attrition bias was detected when comparing the characteristics of those completing (N = 113) vs. those not completing the endline survey (N = 41). Pre-post Wilcoxon signed-test or paired t-test analyses showed that F4M had a positive impact on healthy eating readiness (p < 0.001), the consumption of fruits (p < 0.001) and vegetables (p < 0.001), and household food security (p = 0.034). F4M is a promising community-engaged PRx program that may improve readiness for healthy eating, produce intake, and household food security. Implementation research is needed to find out how to effectively scale out and sustain programs like F4M. The study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT05907616).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.