ArticlePloS one2026
Integrative proteomics reveals MSH6 to modulate PARP inhibitor sensitivity in BRCA1/2-proficient ovarian cancer.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ovarian cancer remains a leading cause of gynecologic cancer-related deaths worldwide. Deficiencies in BRCA1/2 are well-established biomarkers that predict sensitivity to poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis). However, emerging evidence indicates that a subset of BRCA-proficient tumors also responds to PARPi therapy, suggesting the presence of additional molecular mechanisms. We hypothesized that the composition of the PARP1 protein complex and PARylation-mediated signaling contribute to PARPi response in BRCA-proficient HGSOC. We assessed PARPi response across a panel of BRCA-proficient ovarian cancer cell lines and identified distinct sensitive and resistant groups. Chemical proteomics with rucaparib revealed different PARP1 complexes including higher enrichment of MSH6 in sensitive cells. Co-immunoprecipitation analyses further confirmed differential assembly of PARP1-MSH6-PARP2 complexes between sensitive and resistant models. To explore PARylation signaling, we performed ADP-ribosylation proteomics using clickable NAD⁺ analogs, revealing distinct PARylation profiles between sensitive and resistant cell lines. CHAF1A, a known MSH6 interactor and PARP1 substrate, showed more pronounced reduction in ADP-ribosylation in PARPi-sensitive cells. Targeting MSH6 using CRISPR or siRNA decreased PARPi sensitivity. In addition, mTOR signaling was reduced in sensitive, but increased in resistant cells, following rucaparib treatment. Notably, MSH6 knockdown led to increased CHAF1A expression regardless of rucaparib treatment. Importantly, knockdown of CHAF1A significantly impaired cell viability, especially in A2780 cells, and suppressed mTOR signaling, suggesting that CHAF1A acts downstream of MSH6 to regulate the mTOR axis. Furthermore, co-treatment with mTORC1 inhibitors enhanced the cellular effects of rucaparib in resistant cells, suggesting a therapeutic potential of targeting downstream mTOR effectors to overcome intrinsic resistance. In conclusion, this study identifies the PARP1-MSH6 interaction to modulate PARPi sensitivity via CHAF1A-mTOR signaling in BRCA-proficient ovarian cancer. By integrating chemical proteomics and ADP-ribosylation proteomics, we delineate the interplay between PARP1 complex composition and signaling dynamics, highlighting MSH6 as a critical modulator of PARPi response and potential biomarker to enhance therapeutic efficacy in BRCA-proficient HGSOC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.