Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42686839›Full record

ArticlePediatric research2026

The specifications of blood components for neonatal transfusion: a European study and critical review.

Nina A M Houben, Rebecca Cardigan, Dirk de Korte, Camila Caram-Deelder, Laila Fazli, Agneta Wikman, Stella Larsson, Marko Karlo Radovčić, Matea Vinković Vlah, Suzanne Fustolo-Gunnink and 7 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Nina A M HoubenWillem-Alexander Children's Hospital, Division of Neonatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands. n.a.m.houben@lumc.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7605-4927
Rebecca CardiganComponent Development, NHS Blood & Transplant, Cambridge, UK.
Dirk de Korte
Camila Caram-DeelderDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Laila FazliWillem-Alexander Children's Hospital, Division of Neonatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Agneta WikmanClinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Stella LarssonClinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden.
Marko Karlo RadovčićCroatian Institute of Transfusion Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
Matea Vinković VlahCroatian Institute of Transfusion Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia.
Suzanne Fustolo-GunninkWillem-Alexander Children's Hospital, Division of Neonatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Charles C RoehrNational Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Oxford Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Christof DameCharité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Simon J StanworthNHS Blood and Transplant, London, UK.
Enrico LoprioreWillem-Alexander Children's Hospital, Division of Neonatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands.
Helen V NewNHS Blood and Transplant, London, UK.
Neonatal Transfusion Network
SCONE collaborators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBlood component safety measures implemented by Blood Establishments (BE) specifically for neonates are frequently precautionary rather than evidence based. We conducted a European survey on specifications for neonatal red blood cells, platelet, and plasma transfusions.

methodsThe survey was sent to transfusion experts in BEs in 38 European countries between May 2023 and January 2024. We received responses from 20/38 countries.

resultsMany BEs provide neonatal components with additional safety features not routinely applied for adults, and we found evidence of significant variation in practice. 12/19 BEs used a shorter shelf life for split units compared to adult components. For neonatal exchange, 12/19 used saline-adenine-glucose-mannitol (SAGM) replaced with FFP prior to issue. Three BEs performed additional donor or component testing for neonatal units, including screening for lead concentrations (1/20).

conclusionWe identified three questions for which we conducted a critical literature review, around use of short-shelf life of red cells, use of additive solutions, and significance of lead concentrations for neonatal components. Although there were relevant articles addressing these questions, we found a lack of definitive evidence for much precautionary practice, and a need for wider study of the impact of lead in neonatal transfusions to inform future strategies.

Identifiers

PMID42686839

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.