ReviewMolecular biomedicine2026
Artificial intelligence and ultra-high performance computing methods and experiments for drug discovery: virtual screening, deep learning, molecular dynamics simulations, ADMET modelling, and experimental validation.
Review in Molecular biomedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent years have witnessed considerable progress in computer-aided drug discovery, driven by the incorporation of computational technologies within both academic and pharmaceutical environments. This evolution is marked by a significant accumulation of data pertaining to detailed three-dimensional structural information, ligand properties, and their interactions with therapeutic targets. The augmentation of computational capabilities and the accessibility of extensive chemical libraries containing billions of drug-like small molecules have further facilitated this transition. To effectively utilize these resources, it is imperative to employ rapid computing methods for virtual screening, which encompass structure-driven in silico screening across vast molecular spaces, supported by efficient recurrent profiling techniques. Furthermore, advancements in deep learning methodologies are required to improve the accuracy of prediction concerning target functionalities and ligand characteristics, even when complete receptor structures are not available. Here, this review discusses the expansion of chemical space, advanced virtual screening, deep learning, molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, Absorption, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion, and Toxicity (ADMET) modelling, and challenges for drug discovery. It examines how experimental validation integrates computational predictions with laboratory testing for effective candidate selection. Finally, it outlines future research directions for artificial intelligence-driven, ultra-high performance computing (UHPC) in drug discovery, offering new prospects for the economical creation of safer and more efficacious molecule-level therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.