ReviewMaternal health, neonatology and perinatology2026
Challenges in implementing optimal perinatal regionalization: a scoping review.
Review in Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPerinatal regionalization is a healthcare model designed to ensure that high-risk mothers and newborns receive care in facilities equipped with appropriate expertise and technology. While evidence supports its effectiveness in improving outcomes, the implementation of regionalized systems remains inconsistent and vulnerable to a range of clinical, structural, and financial barriers. This scoping review aimed to identify, categorize, and synthesize the reported challenges that hinder the effective functioning of perinatal regionalization systems across diverse settings.
methodsA scoping review methodology was used following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Studies were included if they reported on barriers to regionalized perinatal care. PubMed, Science Direct, and Web of Science were searched covering publications up to May 2024; updated in June 2026. Data were extracted and thematically analyzed, leading to the development of a structured framework of challenge domains.
resultsAfter screening and reviewing the retrieved studies, 41 papers included in final synthesis from which 67 challenges of perinatal regionalization were identified. These challenges were organized into 27 subthemes within seven categories: (1) clinical and medical challenges, including unpredictability of high-risk childbirths and clinical contraindications to maternal transport; (2) socio-economic and geographic barriers, such as distance from tertiary centers and poverty; (3) cultural and patient-centered concerns, including loss of patient rights and connection, and cultural resistance; (4) provider-centered factors, such as loss of prestige, perceived viability, and practice behaviors; (5) organizational and financial disincentives, including competition between hospitals and misaligned reimbursement models; (6) transport and logistical limitations; and (7) structural constraints in low-resource settings, including inadequate infrastructure and weak referral networks.
conclusionPerinatal regionalization is undermined by interrelated challenges across multiple levels of the health system. Addressing these barriers requires systemic reform, improved coordination, and context-specific strategies to ensure access to risk-appropriate care for all mothers and newborns. The framework of challenges developed in this review can inform policy, planning, and future research on strengthening regionalized perinatal care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.