Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42687943›Full record

ArticleResearch square2026

The Effect of a Global Health Shock on Preventive Drug Intake: Evidence from SHARE 2020-2022 for 15 European Countries.

Hans Gevers

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Hans GeversEstonian Business School, Department Research, Development & PhD Studies.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-0249-4142

Funding

Enhancing the Comparability of SHARE with HRS and ELSAR01AG052527 · NIA · MAX PLANCK INST/SOCIAL LAW/SOCIAL POLICY · PI BOERSCH-SUPAN, AXEL H · 2016 to 2020
$2.1M
NIA NIH HHS HHSN271201300071CNIA NIH HHS R01 AG052527
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-medication is known to have potential harmful consequences. In times of a health shock, like the COVID-19 pandemic, preventive drug intake may imply irresponsible behaviour. To provide insight into this phenomenon, this study explores the preventive behaviour of 4,642 respondents of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE) for the period 2020-2022 and 15 European countries. It aims at highlighting relevant drivers and relies on an econometric analysis backed by random-effects panel logistic as well as pooled logistic estimators. The results indicate that being female, more educated, with income, in worse health, or out of work due to COVID-19 relates to higher odds of using preventive drugs for COVID-19 disease. Interaction effects illustrate that those who report symptoms are additionally more likely to take preventive drugs when in poor health, with income, or having hardly any difficulties with making ends meet. Surprisingly, preventive drug intake when reporting symptoms decreases at older ages. No relevant impact is found for relationship status, financial distress, and country of citizenship. Overall, the study identifies important drivers of preventive drug intake informative for policymaking in the context of a health shock like COVID-19.

Indexed as

Europehealth shocklongitudinalpreventive drug intakeSHARE

Identifiers

PMID42687943
PMCPMC13532998

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.