Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42688249›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2026

A clinical evaluation of HyperSight CBCT enhanced offline adaptive breast radiotherapy.

Jina Kim, Mi-Hwa Kim, Hae-Jin Park

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jina Kim *Department of Radiation Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Mi-Hwa Kim *Department of Radiation Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.
Hae-Jin ParkDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Anatomical changes such as seroma shrinkage, soft-tissue deformation, and tumor-bed displacement frequently occur during breast radiotherapy and may compromise target coverage or increase unnecessary dose to surrounding tissues when the initial plan is maintained throughout treatment. Offline adaptive radiotherapy (ART) requires CBCT systems with CT-equivalent HU accuracy and robust dose-recalculation accuracy to reliably quantify these changes. This study evaluated whether the newly integrated HyperSight CBCT on the Halcyon platform provides high image quality, HU-to-electron density accuracy, and dosimetric reliability to support offline ART in breast cancer. Methods: Twelve patients who underwent treatment with both Halcyon 3.1 and Halcyon-HyperSight systems were analyzed. Image quality was assessed using structural similarity metrics (SSIM, RMSE, NRMSE), uniformity, signal and noise characteristics, contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and edge-based indices. HU-to-ED curves were generated using a tissue-equivalent electron-density phantom and applied for CBCT-based dose recalculation. Results: Compared with Halcyon 3.1, HyperSight demonstrated significantly improved structural similarity to simulation CT, with higher SSIM and lower RMSE/NRMSE, as well as significantly improved uniformity and edge sharpness. HU-to-ED linearity for HyperSight closely matched simulation CT across soft-tissue and bone-equivalent materials, whereas Halcyon 3.1 exhibited HU bias and large variability. Dosimetrically, HyperSight accurately reproduced CT-based CI_Paddick and HI values, showing markedly reduced deviations relative to Halcyon 3.1. Clinical evaluation further showed that HyperSight identified volumetric and positional changes in both the whole breast and tumor bed, identifying regions susceptible to high-dose spill or under-coverage when no plan adaptation was performed. Discussion: These findings suggest that HyperSight provides HU accuracy closer to that of simulation CT, improved image quality, and more accurate CBCT-based dose recalculation than Halcyon 3.1, thereby supporting the identification of clinically meaningful anatomical changes. HyperSight may therefore serve as a practical imaging option for offline ART in breast radiotherapy and may help reduce reliance on repeat simulation CT in selected cases while supporting adaptive treatment assessment.

Indexed as

breast cancerCBCTHalcyonHyperSightimage qualityoffline adaptive radiotherapy

Identifiers

PMID42688249
PMCPMC13533814

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.