Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42688337›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026

The self-directed patient in guided internet-delivered CBT: a qualitative study of patient role expectations.

Beate Standal, Robin Maria Francisca Kenter, Monika Knudsen Gullslett, Tine Nordgreen, Jørn Heggelund, Inger Lise Teig

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Beate StandalDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Robin Maria Francisca KenterResearch Centre for Digital Mental Health Services, Division of Psychiatry, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Monika Knudsen GullslettNorwegian Centre for E-health Research, University Hospital of Northern Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Tine NordgreenResearch Centre for Digital Mental Health Services, Division of Psychiatry, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Jørn HeggelundDepartment of Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Inger Lise TeigDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Therapist-guided internet-delivered cognitive behavioral therapy (guided iCBT) is an effective and scalable treatment for anxiety and depression. Central to this format is the expectation that patients work independently with therapeutic content. However, limited attention has been paid to how healthcare professionals and patients within guided iCBT understand the patient role. Objective: This study explores how healthcare professionals and patients understand the patient role in guided iCBT, using self-determination theory to examine how autonomy, competence, and relatedness shape experiences of the patient role. Methods: A qualitative study was conducted in Norwegian specialist mental health services, where guided iCBT is delivered as part of routine care, combining interviews and observations with healthcare professionals ( Results: Healthcare professionals constructed an ideal of the "motivated and self-driven" patient, reflecting an implicit norm of self-direction as a core expectation of the patient role. Patients varied in their ability to enact this role: some described themselves in ways that aligned with this expectation, emphasizing independence and skill use, while others experienced tensions between demands for autonomy, their perceived competence, and their need for structure and relational support. Although many patients reported gaining skills, the treatment was also described as demanding and, at times, overwhelming, with difficulties in participation frequently framed as personal failure, accompanied by self-criticism and guilt. Conclusion: Guided iCBT relies on an implicit expectation that patients will be self-directed, but patients' experiences vary depending on how well they can assume this role. From a self-determination theory perspective, autonomy may function not only as a supportive resource but also as a demand when support for competence and relatedness is insufficient. These findings highlight the importance of carefully structuring and supporting expectations of self-direction within guided iCBT.

Indexed as

autonomydigital mental healthguided iCBTmotivationpatient rolequalitative researchself-determination theory

Identifiers

PMID42688337
PMCPMC13534039

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.