ReviewFrontiers in neuroscience2026
From deep brain stimulation to brain-computer interfaces: current progress in implantable neurotechnology.
Review in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Brain implants, including deep brain stimulation (DBS) systems, brain-computer interfaces (BCIs), and speech neuroprostheses, are moving from the proof-of-concept stage to early clinical deployment. Although these systems target different clinical problems, we argue that they share a common closed-loop architecture (sensing, decoding, stimulation or output, power and telemetry, and chronic clinical validation) and that their translational pace is set by bottlenecks at these shared stages rather than by challenges unique to each technology. Recent milestones, including the regulatory clearance of a cortical interface and an expanding set of implanted-BCI trials, have accelerated progress in the field. This mini-review uses this shared architecture to compare progress across three fronts: the shift from open-to-closed-loop DBS and its widening range of neurological and psychiatric indications; BCIs restoring motor and sensory function; and speech neuroprostheses that decode attempted speech into text, voice, and facial animation. We highlight enabling advances in flexible electrodes, AI-assisted decoding, and neuromorphic edge processing, and examine unresolved controversies over electrode architecture and system design. We conclude that the same handful of bottlenecks recur across all three technologies (long-term stability, neural coding, and equitable access) and outline the governance frameworks needed alongside continued engineering progress.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.