ReviewFrontiers in immunology2026
Impact of preformed donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies on pancreatic islet transplantation outcomes: do they matter as they do in solid organ transplantation?
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Preformed donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA) are a major risk factor for antibody-mediated rejection and graft failure in kidney, heart, lung, and other vascularized solid organ transplants. Their clinical significance in pancreatic islet transplantation, however, remains uncertain. Methods: We conducted a SANRA-guided narrative review using a focused PubMed search (January 1, 2000, to June 9, 2026) supplemented by citation chasing. Of 104 records identified, 11 directly evaluating islet transplantation formed the core evidence base, complemented by 38 references providing mechanistic, immunologic, and solid-organ context. Results: The available islet-specific evidence is dominated by small single-center studies, registry analyses, and case series, with few reports directly evaluating preformed DSA. Across these reports, preformed DSA have not shown the consistent adverse effect expected from kidney transplantation, but the evidence is insufficient to establish safety. In the largest focused cohort, Piemonti et al. reported no clear association between preformed DSA and graft failure, whereas post-transplant antibody evolution was more closely linked to impaired graft survival. Brooks et al. similarly found rapid graft dysfunction after Conclusions: The limited evidence is insufficient to support a universal policy of automatic exclusion of otherwise suitable islet candidates solely because of low-level preformed DSA; nor does it establish that such antibodies are safe. Because the evidence derives mainly from small single-center cohorts, registry analyses, and case series, this conclusion is provisional and may not be generalized across programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.