ReviewResearch (Washington, D.C.)2026
Unveiling Particulate Matter-Lung Interactions from Static Models to Dynamic Lung-on-Chips.
Review in Research (Washington, D.C.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The pervasive inhalable particulate matter (PM) in the environment poses a marked threat to pulmonary health. However, the underlying pathogenic mechanisms remain poorly understood, largely due to the limitations of existing in vitro models in accurately mimicking the complex biological processes. This review critically examines the spectrum of in vitro models employed in PM research, spanning from traditional 2-dimensional models to advanced 3-dimensional (3D) constructs, including 3D bioprinted models and organoids, as well as the burgeoning field of lung-on-chips (LOCs). Each model type is meticulously assessed for its unique strengths and the challenges. A particular emphasis is placed on the innovative use of LOCs technology to replicate the dynamic nature of respiratory motion. The review delves into how integrating breath-mimicking stimuli can modulate the intricate interactions between PM and cellular/tissue interfaces. Ultimately, it unveils an innovative, highly integrated, and intelligent LOCs platform, offering a forward-looking insight into its evolution.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.