ArticleCHEST pulmonary2026
Medium-Dose Compared With High-Dose Inhaled Corticosteroids in Combination Triple Inhaler Therapy for Asthma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Article in CHEST pulmonary, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Combination inhaled corticosteroid (ICS)/long-acting beta Research Question: What is the clinical effect of HD compared with MD ICSs in ICS/LABA/LAMA treatment of asthma? Study Design and Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials including > 1 ICS dose in ICS/LABA/LAMA inhalers compared the outcomes of HD and MD ICS/LABA/LAMA. The primary outcome was the proportion of participants with ≥ 1 severe asthma exacerbations. Secondary outcomes included FEV Results: Three randomized controlled trials (N = 3,804) were identified, comparing MD and HD ICS/LABA/LAMA containing fluticasone or mometasone. When comparing HD with MD ICS/LABA/LAMA for at least 1 severe exacerbation, the Peto OR was 0.81 (95% CI, 0.68-0.96; Interpretation: Our results show that HD compared with MD ICS/LABA/LAMA reduces the odds of a severe exacerbation by about 20%. This absolute risk reduction was modest but may be clinically relevant for patients with high baseline exacerbation rates and those with high type 2 inflammation. At both the individual and population level, the use of HD ICS/LABA/LAMA needs to be considered alongside the potential systemic side effects. Clinical Trial Registration: PROSPERO Registry; No.: CRD42025634340; URL: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.