Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42690528›Full record

ReviewJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

Artificial Intelligence for Cerebral Aneurysm Management: Integrating Imaging, Hemodynamics, and Clinical Decision Support.

Reza Bozorgpour, Pilhwan Kim, Jacob Rammer

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Reza BozorgpourDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA. bozorgp2@uwm.edu.
Pilhwan KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Jacob RammerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering and Applied Science, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, WI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cerebral aneurysms are complex vascular lesions whose rupture can result in subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH), a condition associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Although current clinical risk assessment relies primarily on morphological characteristics such as aneurysm size and location, these factors alone are often insufficient for individualized rupture risk prediction. Advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) have enabled the integration of imaging, clinical, morphological, and computational data, creating new opportunities to improve aneurysm detection, risk stratification, and treatment planning. This systematic review evaluates recent applications of AI and ML across the cerebral aneurysm clinical pipeline, focusing on three major domains: (i) automated detection and segmentation from medical imaging, (ii) rupture risk prediction using clinical, morphological, radiomic, and computational fluid dynamics (CFD)-derived hemodynamic features, and (iii) clinical decision support for treatment planning and outcome prediction. The reviewed studies are examined with respect to their methodological approaches, input features, predictive performance, validation strategies, and clinical applicability. Across the literature, multimodal models that integrate heterogeneous data sources generally demonstrate superior predictive performance compared with approaches relying on a single feature category. However, widespread clinical implementation remains limited by retrospective study designs, heterogeneous datasets, inconsistent validation practices, limited external validation, and challenges related to model interpretability and generalizability. Emerging directions, including explainable AI, multimodal learning, and physics-informed ML, offer promising opportunities to improve model robustness and facilitate clinical translation. Overall, the reviewed evidence indicates that AI has considerable potential to support the detection, risk assessment, and management of cerebral aneurysms, while emphasizing the need for standardized datasets, prospective multicenter validation, and interpretable models to enable reliable clinical adoption.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligence (AI)Clinical decision supportComputational fluid dynamics (CFD)Deep learning (DL)Explainable AIHemodynamicsMachine learning (ML)Medical imagingOscillatory shear index (OSI)Rupture risk predictionWall shear stress (WSS)

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.