ArticlePituitary2026
Internal validation of THINKERS-PA for outcome prediction after pituitary adenoma radiosurgery.
Article in Pituitary, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOutcome prediction after Gamma Knife radiosurgery (GKRS) for pituitary adenomas remains guided by tumor anatomy, functional status, prior treatment, optic-apparatus proximity, and physician experience rather than individualized estimates of tumor response, biochemical remission, and endocrine morbidity. We developed THINKERS-PA, a mixture-of-experts (MoE) framework for outcome prediction and prescription-dose simulation after GKRS.
methodsWe performed a retrospective study of 125 patients with pituitary adenomas treated with GKRS. Variables available at treatment planning were used to train a three-expert MoE neural network integrating clinical and endocrine history, tumor anatomy and imaging, and radiosurgical dosimetry. Discrete-time survival heads estimated tumor progression, biochemical remission in functioning adenomas, and new hypopituitarism. Secondary endpoints include a favorable composite outcome, visual deterioration, and need for additional treatment. Validation used repeated nested 5-fold cross-validation. A dose-sweeping module evaluated treatment doses.
resultsThe cohort included 72 functioning and 53 nonfunctioning adenomas. Tumor progression occurred in 14.4%, biochemical remission in 59.7% of functioning adenomas, and new hypopituitarism in 25.0% of patients at risk. Mean out-of-fold time-dependent AUCs were 0.82 for progression, 0.84 for biochemical remission, and 0.81 for hypopituitarism. Corresponding integrated Brier scores were 0.083, 0.143, and 0.119; calibration slopes were 0.89, 0.91, and 0.87; and censoring-aware mean absolute errors were 10.7, 8.6, and 9.8 months. Dose-sweeping estimates were within ± 1 Gy of the delivered dose in 71% of patients.
conclusionsTHINKERS-PA provides an internally validated framework for individualized prediction of tumor, endocrine, and treatment-related outcomes after GKRS. External multicenter validation is required before clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42693349What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.