ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Ageism, ableism, and their associated factors among international undergraduate medical students in China: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ageism and ableism are common attitudes that have significant effects on the quality of healthcare provided to older adults and people with impairments. Despite growing concern, research into these biases among undergraduate medical students is limited, particularly in Asian educational contexts. As future healthcare providers, medical students' early views on aging and disability must be addressed; however, little research has investigated the interrelationship between ageism and ableism in this population. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted among 199 undergraduate medical students at Qingdao University in China. Data were gathered using the Relational Aging Anxiety Scale, which has five subscales: affinity for older adults, internalized ageism, relational ageism, internalized ableism, and relational ableism. All subscales showed Variable internal consistency (0.429-0.861), with three subscales meeting acceptable thresholds and two falling below the conventional 0.70 criterion. Pearson correlation analysis and four multiple linear regression models were used to investigate Factors associated with ageism and ableism outcomes, with demographic variables (age, gender, year of study, and prior experience) and attitudinal subscales serving as independent variables. Results: Positive correlations have been identified between internalized and relational ageism (r = 0.41, Conclusion: Among undergraduate medical students, ageism and ableism are closely related, with attitudinal indicators outperforming demographic ones. In order to address both biases concurrently in undergraduate medical education and advance fair, inclusive patient care, these findings underscore the critical need for focused educational interventions, such as structured experiential learning, reflective practice, and disability-focused curriculum content.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.