ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Does digital infrastructure improve individuals' body weight? A quasi-natural experiment based on "Broadband China" policy.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Whether digital infrastructure development improves population health outcomes remains empirically contested. This study exploits China's "Broadband China" pilot policy-implemented in staggered batches across 117 cities during 2014-2016-as a quasi-natural experiment and employs a difference-in-differences (DID) design with seven waves of the China Family Panel Studies (CFPS, 2010-2022) to estimate the causal effect of broadband infrastructure expansion on individual body weight and weight-related health inequality. The main findings are threefold. First, the "Broadband China" policy significantly reduces individual BMI by 0.254 units and lowers the BMI relative deprivation index by 0.004, indicating simultaneous improvements in average body weight and reductions in health inequality. Second, heterogeneity analyses reveal a dual-edged pattern: the policy disproportionately benefits vulnerable populations-including residents in economically underdeveloped regions, women, and older adults-thereby narrowing digital health divides, yet exerts stronger effects among highly educated groups, suggesting that educational disparities may perpetuate inequality through differential digital health literacy. Third, mechanism analysis reveals that the policy functions through four pathways: improving mental health, enhancing life satisfaction, cutting working hours and raising physical activity time. In terms of negative competitive mechanisms, the policy also exerts adverse effects by delaying sleep time and increasing sedentary duration. These findings provide policy-relevant evidence for leveraging digital infrastructure as a public health intervention tool in developing countries.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.