ReviewFrontiers in molecular neuroscience2026
From metabolism to neurodegeneration: how microglial functional reprogramming drives neurodegenerative diseases.
Review in Frontiers in molecular neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Microglia are brain-resident myeloid cells that maintain central nervous system homeostasis and respond dynamically to neuronal injury, protein aggregation, and alterations in the local metabolic environment. Single-cell and single-nucleus studies demonstrate that microglial responses in neurodegenerative diseases are highly heterogeneous and cannot be adequately explained by the classical M1/M2 polarization model. Increasing evidence further indicates that metabolic remodeling is not merely a consequence of activation but a determinant of microglial migration, phagocytosis, inflammatory signaling, redox balance, organelle function, and interactions with surrounding neural cells. In this review, we propose a microglial immunometabolic trajectory framework in which metabolic states are viewed as branching and potentially reversible determinants of cellular function rather than fixed stages of a universal disease pathway. We summarize how glucose metabolism, mitochondrial function, lipid metabolism, amino acid metabolism, lysosomal activity, and redox regulation shape microglial plasticity. We further examine relationships among transcriptionally defined states, including disease-associated microglia, microglia associated with neurodegeneration, lipid-droplet-accumulating microglia, and other disease-enriched populations, while emphasizing that transcriptional similarity does not necessarily imply metabolic function or lineage progression. Comparative evidence from Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis indicates that common metabolic regulators, including HIF-1α, mTOR, PKM2, TREM2, APOE, and NLRP3, exert disease-specific effects with unequal mechanistic support. We further distinguish associative metabolic signatures from intervention-based causal evidence and discuss limitations of animal models, immortalized cell lines, postmortem tissue, and induced pluripotent stem cell-derived microglia. Finally, we highlight the need for cell-specific, state-resolved, and temporally precise metabolic interventions that restore defined microglial functions without compromising physiological immune surveillance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.