ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2026
Changes in incidence of rotablation-induced coronary perforation by modifying practice over time: experiences at a high-volume center.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Rotational atherectomy (RA)-induced coronary perforation (CP) represents a dreaded complication, with incidence rates remaining constant and non-negligible for patient safety. Objective: In 2020, we published a paper on four mechanisms of RA-induced CP. In this paper, we hypothesized that modifying practice through general awareness of the mechanisms of RA-induced CP and providing mentorship could lead to a reduction in the incidence of CP. Methods: Consecutive RA patients were recruited and stratified into two groups: January 2009 to December 2019 (Period I) and January 2020 to February 2024 (Period II). During Period II, efforts (structured education, case advice, and case review) to promote general awareness of the four mechanisms of the RA-induced CP were made and mentorship from experienced operators was provided to ensure adherence to good RA practice. Results: A total of 877 patients were recruited: 510 in Period I and 367 in Period II. Most RA procedures were performed for single vessels in both periods. For non-left main vessels, more distally located and bifurcation lesions were treated in Period I, but the incidence of severe calcification was slightly higher in Period II than in Period 1. Less RA was performed for side branches only, and the use of only the 1.25 mm burr increased in Period II. RA could be successfully completed in a high percentage of patients in both periods (98.4% vs. 98.4%, Conclusion: Modifying RA practice through general awareness of the four mechanisms of RA-induced CP and provision of mentorship from experienced operators helped lower the incidence of this fearful complication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.