ReviewReviews in cardiovascular medicine2026
The Role of PoCUS in the Diagnosis and Early Monitoring of Cardiogenic Shock in the Emergency Department: A Narrative Review.
Review in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is the most serious heart failure manifestation, characterised by a significant risk of morbidity and mortality despite improving diagnosis and treatment: early recognition and accurate hemodynamic phenotypization are crucial to improve its poor prognosis. Recently, point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) has evolved as a key method in emergency settings for fast shock assessment. Evidence indicates that PoCUS improves the clinician's diagnostic accuracy by identifying ventricular dysfunction, valvular disease, complications of myocardial infarction, loading conditions, and systemic congestion. Multiorgan protocols that combine cardiac, pulmonary, and vascular assessments enable differentiation among cardiogenic, obstructive, hypovolemic, and distributive shock. Echocardiographic parameters-including ventricular function, volume indices, and dynamic measures such as stroke volume and cardiac output-can guide fluid management, vasoactive therapy, and circulatory support. Limitations include operator dependence and potential imaging challenges due to patient factors. When combined with clinical and laboratory data, PoCUS is a fundamental tool for early CS assessment. With this paper, we aimed to describe the role of PoCUS in the differential diagnosis of undifferentiated shock, confirming or ruling out CS, assessing CS prognosis, guiding appropriate treatment and enabling hemodynamic monitoring. Integrating PoCUS elements with validated classifications, such as the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI) CS stages, can be useful for improving CS management. This review highlights validated PoCUS markers, practical PoCUS applications within the SCAI framework, and areas for further research, emphasising the increasing role of PoCUS in personalised, physiology-guided management of CS in the emergency department.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.