Observational studyJMIR nursing2026
Nursing Process Data for Health Care Cost Prediction Using Machine Learning: Longitudinal Study.
Observational study in JMIR nursing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Machine learning (ML) has been demonstrated to enhance health care cost prediction by handling high-dimensional data and identifying complex patterns. However, current risk-adjustment models rarely incorporate structured nursing information derived from the nursing process. This information captures care needs and human responses to health problems. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of integrating nursing process data into ML-based predictive models of individual health care costs, including cost component analyses, compared with models based solely on sociodemographic, clinical, and morbidity-related variables. Methods: A retrospective observational study was conducted using a population-based cohort of 1,691,075 individuals aged 15 years or younger who were registered with the Canary Islands Health Service. Predictors were derived from data available up to 2017 and included sociodemographic and clinical variables, Adjusted Morbidity Groups, health care use, and structured nursing records (Functional Health Patterns [FHP], North American Nursing Diagnosis Association [NANDA], Nursing Outcomes Classification [NOC], and Nursing Interventions Classification [NIC]). Predictive models were developed using feedforward neural networks and extreme gradient boosting; predictions were combined using an ensemble approach. An autoencoder was applied as a dimensionality-reduction technique for the nursing variables. Model performance with and without nursing variables was compared on total cost and individual cost components, and the coefficient of determination ( Results: Including the nursing methodology yielded small numerical increases in predictive performance. With respect to total cost, the ensemble model improved the Conclusions: Integrating structured information from the nursing process is associated with small incremental improvements in ML-based predictive models and complements commonly used sociodemographic, clinical, and morbidity variables. The systematic incorporation of nursing data into predictive tools may contribute to more accurate health care cost prediction and support more holistic, person-centered approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.