ArticleScientific reports2026
Antimicrobial peptides as computational candidates for SARS-CoV-2 papain-like protease inhibition.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
SARS-CoV-2 papain-like protease (PLpro) remains an attractive antiviral target because of its dual role in viral polyprotein processing and host immune modulation. In this study, we employed an exploratory structure-based computational workflow to identify antimicrobial peptide scaffolds with predicted PLpro-binding potential. A total of 6,615 peptides compiled from public databases were screened using protein-peptide docking, followed by molecular dynamics simulations and end-state binding energy analysis for selected complexes. Among the prioritized candidates, peptides 33,035 and 17,047 showed favorable predicted occupation of the catalytic region and persistent interactions with residues in the active-site environment. Molecular dynamics analyses suggested sustained peptide engagement within the PLpro binding region, although distinct degrees of conformational adaptation were observed across systems. MM/PBSA calculations provided additional energetic support for peptide-PLpro association in the selected complexes. In silico toxicity prediction further indicated that peptide 33,035 may require sequence optimization before translational consideration. Overall, our results identify peptide scaffolds worthy of future biochemical and antiviral validation, while reinforcing the need for experimental confirmation and further optimization before any therapeutic inference can be made.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.