Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42698546›Full record

ArticleJournal of traditional and complementary medicine2026

Yen-Chun Koh, Jie-Yu Ruan, Cho-Hua Wan, Min-Hsiung Pan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of traditional and complementary medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yen-Chun KohDepartment of Seafood Science, National Kaohsiung University of Science and Technology, 81157, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Jie-Yu RuanInstitute of Food Sciences and Technology, National Taiwan University, 10617, Taipei, Taiwan.
Cho-Hua WanSchool of Veterinary Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Min-Hsiung PanInstitute of Food Sciences and Technology, National Taiwan University, 10617, Taipei, Taiwan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aim: Experimental procedure: Male C57BL/6 mice were assigned to standard diet, HFD, or HFD with MAL supplementation via drinking water for 12 weeks. Body weight, fat mass, and adipocyte morphology were assessed. Serum adiponectin levels and hepatic AMPK activation were measured. Inflammatory protein markers in liver and adipose tissues were analyzed by Western blot. Results and conclusion: MAL supplementation did not significantly reduce body weight or fat mass, possibly due to insufficient dosing via drinking water. However, MAL significantly reduced adipocyte size, suggesting a shift from hypertrophy to hyperplasia. Serum adiponectin levels were elevated, and hepatic AMPK activation was enhanced, indicating potential improvements in lipid metabolism and insulin sensitivity. Moreover, expression of inflammatory markers such as TNF-α, MCP-1, and IL-6 was reduced in liver and adipose tissue. These findings suggest that while MAL had limited anti-obesity effects under current administration, it exerted notable anti-inflammatory benefits. Further studies using more concentrated supplementation forms are recommended.

Indexed as

InflammationMorus alba L.Mulberry leaveObesityTea

Identifiers

PMID42698546
PMCPMC13541589

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.