ArticleJB & JS open access
A Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Among Undenatured Collagen Type II, Glucosamine Sulfate, and Diacerein on Osteoarthritic Knee Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Article in JB & JS open access. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Knee osteoarthritis (OA) causes significant disability with limited effective treatments. Undenatured collagen type II (UC-II), prescription-grade crystalline glucosamine sulfate (pCGS), and diacerein have been proposed as alternatives to conventional analgesics, but their comparative efficacy remains uncertain. We hypothesized that each supplement would demonstrate superior efficacy over placebo in reducing total Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) score at Week 24 in patients with mild-to-moderate knee OA. Methods: This 4-arm, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolled 216 Thai adults with symptomatic knee OA (Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2-3). Participants received UC-II (40 mg once daily), pCGS (500 mg 3 times daily), diacerein (50 mg once to twice daily), or placebo for 24 weeks, with follow-up to 36 weeks. The primary outcome was total WOMAC score (22 items; pain, stiffness, and physical function; scored 0-220, higher = worse) at Week 24. Analyses followed intention-to-treat principles using multiple imputation by chained equations (m = 10) and linear mixed-effects models. Results: Of 216 randomized Thai participants, 208 (96.3%) completed follow-up (mean age 61.7 ± 7.1 years; 90.9% female; 73.6% Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2). At Week 24, no supplement demonstrated superiority over placebo. Between-group differences in total WOMAC score were as follows: UC-II -4.7 (95% CI -18.6 to 9.1), pCGS -8.1 (95% CI -21.8 to 5.7), and diacerein -12.3 (95% CI -25.9 to 1.3). All 95% CIs included zero, and all point estimates were at or below, and none clearly exceeded, the minimum clinically important difference threshold. At 36 weeks, results were consistent: UC-II -1.8 (95% CI -15.5 to 12.0), pCGS -4.8 (95% CI -18.4 to 8.7), and diacerein -1.3 (95% CI -14.9 to 12.3). Secondary outcomes including pain scores, joint space width, and functional performance showed no significant between-group differences. Adverse events were mild and comparable across groups; no serious adverse events occurred. Conclusions: Among Thai patients with mild-to-moderate knee OA, UC-II, pCGS, and diacerein did not demonstrate superiority over placebo in reducing pain or improving function at 24 weeks. These findings do not support their routine use as monotherapy for knee OA. Trial Registration: Thailand Clinical Trial Registry (TCTR20210901003). Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.