ArticleFrontiers in public health2026
Federated analytics for non-communicable disease surveillance in the European health data space: a scoping review and conceptual framework.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The growing burden of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) in Europe has intensified the need for timely, comparable, and policy-relevant health indicators derived from increasingly heterogeneous health data ecosystems. The European Health Data Space (EHDS) represents a major policy initiative to facilitate the secondary use of health data while preserving privacy, security, and national data sovereignty. In this context, federated analytics can foster international comparisons without requiring the transfer of person-level data. Objectives: This scoping review aimed to map federated analytical approaches relevant to the production of NCD indicators within the EHDS and to develop a conceptual framework linking distributed statistical methods, privacy-preserving infrastructures, and policy-oriented surveillance requirements. Materials and methods: A scoping review was conducted following the PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews. Searches were structured into three complementary conceptual domains: (a) federated analytical approaches, (b) distributed statistical inference methods, and (c) governance and health-data infrastructures relevant to the EHDS. Searches were performed in PubMed, Scopus, and IEEE Xplore, for studies published between 2010-26. Records were exported with abstracts and full bibliographic metadata. Deduplication and metadata-aware merging were conducted across databases using DOI and normalized-title matching. Results: We retrieved a total of 2,362 records, of which 1,285 were unique records and 104 were finally retained. The literature revealed a heterogeneous but rapidly expanding ecosystem of distributed analytical approaches. We identified three major domains: (1) distributed regression; (2) federated or distributed analytical infrastructures; and (3) privacy-preserving federated epidemiological analysis. Discussion: An increasing range of solutions for federated analytics is available for policy-grade NCD indicators. Longitudinal and survival models remain methodologically complex because of covariance structures and globally coupled risk sets. A modular approach is needed to incorporate public-health intelligence and a dynamic set of interoperable tools in the EHDS, with the active support of a decentralized network of active stakeholders. Conclusion: Federated analytics is shifting the paradigm from centralized data pooling to computation-to-data architectures. The successful implementation of NCD surveillance in the EHDS require integrating statistics with legal, IT, policy and governance mechanisms. The review outlined a conceptual framework that can couple technical innovation with the best architecture for public-health knowledge production.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.