ArticlePEC innovation2026
Experiential knowledge and peer support in type 1 diabetes: insights from endurance running communities.
Article in PEC innovation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Managing type 1 diabetes (T1D) during endurance running requires highly individualized strategies, yet conventional healthcare offers limited sport-specific guidance. Peer communities have emerged as key sources of experiential knowledge, emotional support, and practical tools. Objective: To explore how endurance runners with T1D build self-management strategies, use peer networks and digital platforms, and integrate these exchanges into identity and daily life. Methods: Thirteen French-speaking adults with T1D who had completed at least one marathon or ultra-endurance event participated in semi-structured interviews. Data were analyzed using constructivist grounded theory. Two patient contributors living with T1D supported interpretation and writing. COREQ guidelines were followed. Results: Peer communities operated as informal educational systems that transformed individual trial-and-error into shared, actionable knowledge. Digital platforms provided rapid troubleshooting, reflective tools, and distributed mentorship. Role models facilitated confidence, self-efficacy, and identity reconstruction. Despite strong collective dynamics, management remained highly individualized through context-aware "micro-protocols" developed via safe experimentation and peer comparison. Conclusion: Peer communities play a central role in translating clinical recommendations into real-world endurance strategies. Integrating peer mentoring, digital literacy, and structured reflective practice into patient education may enhance personalization and confidence for people living with T1D. Innovation: This study demonstrates how communities of practice and digital infrastructures can support experiential learning in high-variability contexts and illustrates the contribution of patient partners to qualitative analysis and manuscript co-construction. Patient or public contribution: Two individuals living with T1D contributed to interpretation and writing, ensuring relevance and accessibility for the patient community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.