Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42699328›Full record

ReviewThe Lancet regional health. Europe2026

Nurse retention in Europe: why economic evidence matters.

Claudia B Maier, Marjorie Opuni, Julia Köppen, Carolin Gurisch, Matthias Wismar, Howard Catton, Margrieta Langins

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Claudia B MaierDepartment of Health Services Research and Nursing Science, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Marjorie OpuniIndependent Health Economist, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Julia KöppenDepartment of Health Services Research and Nursing Science, School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany.
Carolin GurischDepartment of Health Care Management, Technical University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Matthias WismarEuropean Observatory on Health Systems and Policies, Brussels, Belgium.
Howard CattonInternational Council of Nurses, Geneva, Switzerland.
Margrieta LanginsWHO Regional Office for Europe, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Europe faces a health workforce crisis with nurses comprising the largest occupational group affected. International organisations argue that nurse retention should be the priority response. However, Europe lacks economic evidence to inform evidence-based action on retention. A research gap exists with regard to European studies that quantify nurse turnover costs, provide comparative cost data across countries, or evaluate the cost-effectiveness of retention initiatives. Other high-income countries have measured turnover costs, demonstrating both the feasibility of such analysis and the financial magnitude of the problem. Yet these findings cannot be transferred to European health systems due to differences in clinical practice, payment and other system characteristics, nurse skill-mix, and scope-of-practice. This Viewpoint addresses why turnover cost estimates from other regions cannot be applied to European health systems and what European hospital leaders, workforce planners, and policymakers could do with economic evidence they do not currently have. It calls for a European research agenda that prioritises comparative economic evidence on nurse retention to build the investment cases that decision-makers need. Economic evidence alone will not secure retention investments, but it is difficult to make the case for them without it.

Indexed as

Costs and cost-analysisEuropeNursesPersonnel retentionPersonnel turnover

Identifiers

PMID42699328
PMCPMC13543069

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.